Biolinguistics Special Issue on Recursion

Autors:

Andreas Trotzke

Títol:

Biolinguistics Special Issue on Recursion. Biolinguistics 5, 1–169.

Data de publicació: 27 de juny de 2011
ISBN13: ISSN 1450–3417

Més informació

This special issue takes up three major concerns that have been raised by the recursion-only hypothesis by Hauser et al. (2002). The first concern is how to test for recursion in experimental psychology: Since we cannot test humans on infinite sets of sentences and furthermore self-embedding in the sense of (1) is difficult for humans to process, how can recursion best be tested for? The second major concern is the role of recursion in linguistic theory: Is recursion an integral part of any syntactic structure building or is recursion better viewed as something on top of more basic structure building? Finally, the third major concern this issue addresses is the relation of recursion to the genetic and neural basis of language. Can recursion be separated from other parts of language in the genetic and neural domain?

Trotzke & Wittenberg (2019). Long-standing issues in adjective order…

Autors:

Andreas Trotzke & Eva Wittenberg

Títol:

Long-standing issues in adjective order and corpus evidence for a multifactorial approach

Editorial: Linguistics 57(2), 273-282
Data de publicació: 2 desembre 2019

Més informació
Text complet


In this paper, we introduce the issue of adjective order and show that different approaches vary in their answers to the question of how fine-grained the semantic categories determining adjective order are. We report on a corpus study that we conducted and that illustrates that a clear answer to the question of what general factors exactly determine adjective order is elusive, given the multifactorial nature of the problem. We then present the individual contributions to this special issue, and how they attempt to add new observations from Germanic languages to the general issues revolving around the topic of adjective order.

Trotzke & Kupisch (2020). Formal Linguistics and Language Education

Autors:

Andreas Trotzke & Tanja Kupisch (eds.)

Títol:

Formal Linguistics and Language Education, New Empirical Perspectives

Editorial: Educational Linguistics vol.43, Springer
Data de publicació: Juny de 2020

Més informació

This volume focuses on work that has its origin and motivation in formal linguistics and theory-driven research on the acquisition of grammar, and on this basis tries to establish links to language pedagogy, including students’ and teachers’ beliefs about what ‘grammar’ actually is. The contributions to this volume cover a wide range of empirical linguistic domains and concern aspects of morphosyntax, including word order, inflectional morphology, article systems, pronouns, compounding patterns, as well as orthography and students’ general beliefs about grammar.

Trotzke (2020). Constructions in minimalism: A functional perspective on cyclicity

Autors:

Andreas Trotzke

Títol:

Constructions in minimalism: A functional perspective on cyclicity

Editorial: Frontiers in Psychology
Col·lecció:
Data de publicació: 2020

Més informació

This paper presents a minimalist perspective on syntactic cyclicity that is compatible with fundamental ideas in construction-grammar approaches. In particular, I outline an approach to syntactic structure building where units of potentially any phrasal size can be atomic items in the syntactic derivation, showing that the opposition between words and phrases in minimalism is as artificial as in many construction-grammar approaches. Based on this new perspective on structure building, I focus on the empirical domain of subextraction patterns out of complex subjects, adjuncts, and complements, and I demonstrate that the acceptability patterns in this domain can be explained by a functional approach to syntactic cyclicity: Unacceptable patterns are ruled out not for configurational (and hence syntactic) reasons, but rather they systematically follow from infelicitous interpretations at the syntax-discourse interface. This raises the question of whether syntactic cyclicity is (at least in part) motivated by performance constraints, which I consider another area for fruitful interaction between construction-grammar and usage-based accounts on the one hand and minimalism on the other hand.


Títols de la col·lecció / Also in this series:

Trotzke & Villalba (2020). Exclamatives as responses at the syntax-pragmatics interface

Autors:

Andreas Trotzke & Xavier Villalba

Títol:

Exclamatives as responses at the syntax-pragmatics interface

Editorial: Journal of Pragmatics, 168 (pp. 139–171)
Data de publicació: Octubre del 2020

Més informació
Text complet


In this paper, we explore exclamatives when used as responses in a discourse. Our proposal is based on the following pragmatic observation: so-called that-exclamatives in both Germanic and Romance languages are preferred as responses to polar questions, while wh-exclamatives are restricted to a response use in non-polar contexts. We establish this data pattern empirically by means of two judgment studies, and we then provide a detailed theoretical account for these challenging new data points. In particular, we show that the differences between the response uses of wh-exclamatives and that-exclamatives can be explained on syntactic grounds, analogous to ‘the syntax of answers’ proposed in recent syntactic work by Holmberg (2013, 2015) at the syntax-pragmatics interface. In sum, we provide a pragmatically more refined view on exclamatives and their use in a discourse, suggesting new empirical distinctions at the syntax-pragmatics interface.