BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.32.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://clt.uab.cat/
X-WR-CALNAME:CLT Centre de Lingüística Teòrica
X-WR-CALDESC:Grup de Recerca Consolidat Gran des del 1993 i reconegut com a Centre d'Estudis i Recerca de la UAB el 2006.
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Madrid
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=03;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=4SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-23712318a400454a2c049f165106d985@clt.uab.cat
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20200515T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20200515T170000
DTSTAMP:20200228T122814Z
CREATED:20200228
LAST-MODIFIED:20220531
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:1
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Irene Fernández – The puzzle of number unagreement: the case of Spanish psych-verbs
DESCRIPTION:Seminari del CLT\nThe puzzle of number unagreement: the case of Spanish psych-verbs\nIRENE FERNÁNDEZ (UAB)\nDivendres, 15 de maig de 2020\n15:30\nEnllaç a la videoconferència:\nJoin Teams Meeting ( https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3a965e423f38c3494ba8f4ce9555679d2e%40thread.tacv2/1588756620377?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%226b514c29-2391-4831-b774-84f35c45bf01%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2235ba03a1-0286-4a08-aeba-38bd1d5a8197%22%7d )\nThis talk explores data where in a DAT-NOM configuration, the verb is inflected in 3SG despite the Internal Argument (IA) being in plural:\n(1) Nos gusta los animales\n(2) Me flipa los músicos que solo sacan un single\nI will argue that (1) and (2) are not the same phenomenon. (1) is an instance of ‘true unagreement’ where the oblique argument (the dative experiencer) blocks T-IA agreement, while in (2), the IA has a propositional interpretation. For (1) I will propose that the dative clitic is an intervener and optionality depends on the timing of operations move and agree (Georgi 2014, Obata et al. 2015, Obata & Epstein 2016). On the other hand, the IA of (2) is a concealed CP, reminiscent of the cases of emphatic relatives in Spanish (Brucart 1999, Martínez 1999, Brucart & Gallego 2009).\nIf this proposal is in the right track, these phenomena seem to provide evidence for to two different views of optionality: the former is an instance of ‘true optionality’ (Biberauer & Richards 2006), whereas the latter responds to interpretative factors (Reinhart 1995, Fox 2000).\n
URL:https://clt.uab.cat/activitats_clt/irene-fernandez-the-puzzle-of-number-unagreement-the-case-of-spanish-psych-verbs/
ORGANIZER;CN=Centre de Lingüística Teòrica:MAILTO:cr.clt@uab.cat
CATEGORIES:Seminaris
LOCATION:Seminari del CLT en línia
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://clt.uab.cat/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/fernandez.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR