BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.33.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://clt.uab.cat/
X-WR-CALNAME:CLT Centre de Lingüística Teòrica
X-WR-CALDESC:Grup de Recerca Consolidat Gran des del 1993 i reconegut com a Centre d'Estudis i Recerca de la UAB el 2006.
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Madrid
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=03;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=4SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-0a49e3c3a03ebde64f85c0bacd8a08e2@clt.uab.cat
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20181025T000000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20181027T000000
DTSTAMP:20181001T162623Z
CREATED:20181001
LAST-MODIFIED:20220531
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:3
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Workshop Acceptability judgments in current linguistic theory
DESCRIPTION:Workshop Acceptability judgments in current linguistic theory\nOctober 25th – 26th 2018\nUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona\nInvited Speakers\nGisbert Fanselow (University of Potsdam)\nWolfram Hinzen (ICREA & UPF)\nAntonella Sorace (University of Edinburgh)\nOrganizers\nÁngel J. Gallego (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)\nJaume Mateu (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona)\nThe goal of this workshop is to reflect on and re-consider the notion of “acceptability” and related concepts, and the ways in which they can inform linguistic theorizing. Judgments of “well-formedness” and “deviance” are standardly employed in generative linguistics since Chomsky’s (1955/1975, 1957, 1965) foundational works, despite the fact that these notions have never been clearly defined and their relevance for natural language prominently denied (cf. Chomsky 1986, Chomsky & Lasnik 1993, and Ott 2017 for a survey, amon many others). Is our theory of grammar primarily a model of acceptability (and if so, what exactly is acceptability/deviance?), or of something else, e.g. the constrained ways in which sound and meaning can be paired in natural language, including in “deviant” expressions (Chomsky 1993)? What kinds of speaker intuitions do we want our theory to account for, and which should we exclude as extraneous “noise”? Can naive speakers provide relevant intuitions, or should we rely on linguistically trained informants? How does acceptability relate to grammaticality–if at all? And what can related notions such as speaker preferences, negative data, intra-speaker variation, and substandard/non-frequent data tell us about the language faculty, and the ways in which we can elucidate its nature?\n\n
URL:https://clt.uab.cat/activitats_clt/workshop-acceptability-judgments-in-current-linguistic-theory/
ORGANIZER;CN=Ángel Gallego:MAILTO:angel.gallego@uab.cat
CATEGORIES:Congressos
LOCATION:Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Barcelona)
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://clt.uab.cat/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/acceptability.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR