BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
PRODID:-//WordPress - MECv7.33.0//EN
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://clt.uab.cat/
X-WR-CALNAME:CLT Centre de Lingüística Teòrica
X-WR-CALDESC:Grup de Recerca Consolidat Gran des del 1993 i reconegut com a Centre d&#039;Estudis i Recerca de la UAB el 2006.
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Madrid
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Madrid
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T030000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=03;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=4SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
CLASS:PUBLIC
UID:MEC-8be904ad045c578053fc6052578f9324@clt.uab.cat
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260410T153000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Madrid:20260410T170000
DTSTAMP:20260316T152404Z
CREATED:20260316
LAST-MODIFIED:20260408
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:2
TRANSP:OPAQUE
SUMMARY:Paolo Morosi (UAB): ‘The semantic abilities of Large Language Models are bound by logical reasoning but not by pragmatic enrichment: Evidence from conditionals’
DESCRIPTION:Seminari del CLT\nDivendres, 10 d’abril de 2026\nHora 15:30\nAula 202, Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres\nEnllaç Teams\nAbstract:\nHumans read between the lines, effortlessly going beyond the literal content of words and structures. For instance, when someone says, “If you mow the lawn, I’ll give you 50$”, it is implied that the speaker will pay only if the lawn is mowed (a so-called perfected reading). Conversely, “If you’re hungry, there’s pizza in the oven” implies that pizza is in the oven regardless of the hearer’s hunger (a biscuit reading). Large Language Models (LLMs) show human-like performance on many cognitive tasks, yet it is unclear whether they can reason like humans, and if not, why exactly this ability is still under development.\nIn this talk I will present a population-matching experiment that evaluates how 25 LLMs compute perfected and biscuit inferences with conditionals, across Catalan, English, Italian, and Spanish, and tested against an equal number of humans per language.\nOur results indicate that humans tend to enrich logical reasoning through pragmatic inference cross-linguistically. Model behavior reveals a more variable pattern. Some LLMs perfectly follow the truth-table semantics of conditionals but they ignore pragmatic inferences, while others adhere to a perfected interpretation across the board, reflecting accurate rule-based processing but not human-like pragmatic reasoning. Overall, LLMs are accurate semantic operators, but they may fail to derive the pragmatic inferences that humans typically compute. Crucially, this variation in LLM performance is not predicted by factors such as open vs. closed status, training orientation, or type of architecture, suggesting that pragmatic reasoning is still an emerging ability in the cognitive toolkit of artificial systems.\n \n
URL:https://clt.uab.cat/activitats_clt/seminari-morosi-20260410/
ORGANIZER;CN=Centre de Lingüística Teòrica:MAILTO:cr.clt@uab.cat
CATEGORIES:Seminaris
LOCATION:Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Barcelona)
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://clt.uab.cat/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Morosi_Paolo.jpeg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
